data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6917/c6917cd7db530a1fef512d4b86c09668be541201" alt="The line begins to blur"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8833c/8833c17333fe8e0fce90fa8bd70cdc59fcaa8698" alt="the line begins to blur the line begins to blur"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4591b/4591bf7d48cc5ccbde20d6b24efcadb741e677ed" alt="the line begins to blur the line begins to blur"
Really, lines emerges when the edges of things visually butt up against each other. The meeting of edges can produce all kinds of sensations-a thud, a vibration, a harmony. The thing that is a constant in all of my work is the sense of edge. I’ve thought a lot about line, trying to get at what that means in my work, since I generate lines in both two and three dimensions and in a variety of materials and media. But I think this idea of engagement as engagement gives art its very specific force. Because of this, art has the unique role of presenting us with a work (painting, object, performance, installation, etc.) that has no practical use beyond our own engagement with it. Clearly, that’s not to say that art has no purpose. That’s a different conversation. In general, we collectively separate art from the creative disciplines that generate something utilitarian-practices like graphic design, architecture and craft. It’s a pretty weird distinction that we seem to implicitly agree on. Q: What power does art have that other outlets do not?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6917/c6917cd7db530a1fef512d4b86c09668be541201" alt="The line begins to blur"